Skip to: Curated Story Group 1
healthcarebusinessreview

Advertise

with us

    • US
    • EUROPE
    • APAC
    • CANADA
  • Home
  • Sections
    Business Process Outsourcing
    Compliance & Risk Management
    Consulting Service
    Dental Billing Services
    Facility Management Services
    Financial Services
    Healthcare Digital Marketing
    Healthcare Education
    Healthcare Procurement
    Healthcare Security
    Healthcare Staffing
    Long-Term Care Pharmacy Services
    Medical Billing
    Medical Case Management
    Medical Transportation
    Patient Monitoring
    Practice Management Service
    Real Estate Services
    Supply Chain
    Therapy Services
  • Contributors
  • News
  • Vendors
  • Conferences
  • CXO Awards
Welcome back to this new edition of Healthcare Business Review !!!✖
Sign In

Subscribe to our Weekly Newsletter to get latest updates to your inbox
8 APRIL - 2022If there was any silver lining to the darkest days of the COVID-19 pandemic, it was the way it pushed the entire American health care system toward wider adoption of advanced technologies. As an industry, we've learned how technology can positively impact the patient journey faster than any other set of circumstances could. The learning curve wasn't always a smooth one for many practices ­ but ChenMed was an exception. Our nearly 100 centers in 12 states were able to quickly transition to technology-assisted methods of delivery almost immediately. More than 18 months later, we're still providing high-touch, high-quality telehealth care that our patients in many cases prefer to the "old way" of having to travel to and from a center once per month for preventive care visits. In this article, I'll share insights about how we started ­ and sustained ­ a successful approach to virtual care. Before we get too far into the discussion, let me quickly describe the funding model ChenMed operates on, because it's an important factor in what we've been able to achieve with technology. ChenMed operates on a full-risk, value-based care model, also known as full-risk capitation. This involves a payment structure in which a private insurance company or Medicare enters a partnership with a health care provider. At that point, the health care provider ­ not the insurance company or Medicare ­ is responsible for paying for the patient's health care. This is where the "risk" comes in ­ the provider is responsible for paying for any preventive, specialty, or emergency are the patient may require. However, if the provider is able to help the patient prevent or successfully manage chronic medical conditions ­ therefore avoiding costly emergency department visits or hospital procedures ­ the provider keeps the savings. Therefore, the incentive for full-risk capitation providers like ChenMed is to do whatever they can to help patients stay as healthy as possible. CHENMED'SFULL-RISK CAPITATION FUNDING MODEL IS PERTINENT TO THIS DISCUSSION FOR TWO REASONS:· Because ChenMed operates on a full-risk capitation basis, our centers were able to transition immediately to telehealth and other delivery methods because we knew we would be compensated in the same mannerfor virtual visits as we would for in-person visits. Many fee-for-service providers, on the CXO INSIGHTSHow Full-Risk Capitation Facilitates Innovative Primary CareBy Daniel Guerra, Associate Chief Medical Information Officer at ChenMed
< Page 7 | Page 9 >